Varvara krasa ENGLISH Subs “Варвара Краса длинная коса” (1969) х/ф
OPTIONAL SUBTITLES (ENGLISH, Spanish, French, Portuguese, Italian, Russian, Deutsch, Nederlands). Select the language you want by using “CC” option. If you want any other language just use the option “Translate Captions” from the “CC” button. Barbara the Fair with the Silken Hair Варвара Краса длинная коса Varvara krasa dlinnaya kosa Die schöne Warwara Aleksandr Rou – Director Cast Mikhail Pugovkin – Tsar Berendey Georgiy Millyar – Chudo Yudo Anatoliy Kubatsky Tatyana Klyueva – Varvara Alexei Katyshev – Andrei, the fisherman’s son Sergei Nikolaev – Andrei, the tsar’s son; Lidiya Koroleva; Varvara Popova; Alexandr Khvylya; Boris Sichkin; Valentina Ananina; Vera Petrova; Anastasiya Zueva – Storyteller Magic, mystery, and mistaken identities are all part of this visually striking fantasy based on a well-known Russian fairy tale. While stopping at a well during a journey, Tsar Yeremey (Mikhail Pugovkin) is confronted by Chudo-Yudo the Lawless (Georgi Millyar), a ill-mannered enchanted creature who lives at the bottom of a lake. Chudo-Yudo refuses to release Yeremey without some sort of tribute, so the Tsar agrees that Chudo-Yudo is allowed to take possession of any of the valuables in his fiefdom that he doesn’t know about. However, when Yeremey returns, he learns to his surprise that he has just become a father; terrified that his newborn son will be handed over to Chudo-Yudo, the Tsar makes a secret arrangement with a poor fisherman to exchange babies to keep his child from …
Video Rating: 4 / 5
PART ONE: PUTTING A PRICE TAG ON LIFE Today, companies and governments often use Jeremy Benthams utilitarian logic under the name of cost-benefit analysis. Sandel presents some contemporary cases in which cost-benefit analysis was used to put a dollar value on human life. The cases give rise to several objections to the utilitarian logic of seeking the greatest good for the greatest number. Should we always give more weight to the happiness of a majority, even if the majority is cruel or ignoble? Is it possible to sum up and compare all values using a common measure like money? PART TWO: HOW TO MEASURE PLEASURE Sandel introduces JS Mill, a utilitarian philosopher who attempts to defend utilitarianism against the objections raised by critics of the doctrine. Mill argues that seeking the greatest good for the greatest number is compatible with protecting individual rights, and that utilitarianism can make room for a distinction between higher and lower pleasures. Mills idea is that the higher pleasure is always the pleasure preferred by a well-informed majority. Sandel tests this theory by playing video clips from three very different forms of entertainment: Shakespeares Hamlet, the reality show Fear Factor, and The Simpsons. Students debate which experience provides the higher pleasure, and whether Mills defense of utilitarianism is successful.
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Kind of like a Russian wizard of oz/Willy Wonka movie. I got a kick out of the talking bear and the blue giant elf person.
Good movie, thanks!
@hypergalla I think what you’re referring to is Romanian, not Russian. I’m Romanian and I have an old children’s book called ‘Fat Frumos.’ It means prince charming, but I’m not familiar with the film you may be referring to. Hope that helps!
ужас лол не женихи а одни стариканы к варваре сватаются..да страшные какие, черт знает что лол
Nu i zhuljo!! lol
Ti cho michish, kozjol bezrogiy? LMAO
))
Lilovaja tvoja boshka neschipannaja!
..pered kakoi-to starushentsiej… this is priceless lol
So nostalgic, this is one is so funny, one of my childhood faves
Tolstiy, a slabonervniy! lol
)
#OMG the most #SWAG #BASED vid on youtube search : i swag by yasha swag.
Миш, оставь мне, имей совесть. XD
@hypergalla зарегистрируйтесь вконтакте.ру , там много советских сказок и ” Сказание о храбром витязе Фэт-Фрумосе “
Обалденная сказка
Do you know and old Russian fairy tale “Fetfrumos”? I am not sure about the pronunciation. I was dreaming about this story a long long time…. It was hm.. nearly ’80th when I saw Fetfrumos. If you have it please add to youtube please, please, please!!!!
Remember when you go to your YouTube page and there wasn’t an advertisement at the top of the page?
Remember when music video were uploaded by users and not VEVO?
Remember when there wasn’t advertisements that never go away?
Remember you couldn’t have a limit to favorites?
Remember the famous yellow subscribe button?
Remember there was no WMG?
WE MISS THE OLD YOUTUBE!
Post this in every video!! START A RIOT!!
Thumbs up to keep this at the top of the page!
@ekiyat Да и взрослые некоторые с удовольствием смотрят
))
Замечательный фильм для детей!
I don’t think you can put a price tag on life due to the fact that death is eternal where as happiness (or at least the one described in the roman example) only lasts for a few moments. If you added up the duration of the happiness of all the people who enjoy watching the guy get wrecked by a lion it would never outweigh the eternal longevity of the mans death.
really, when’s the last time anyone read shakespeare for fun?
@jefflamb2412 haha lol
0:54 that kid on the right is fast asleep…
lol mr. economist @10:45 “you have adjust for inflation
“
I wish I was there to comment at the beginning. People already accept a dollar value for human life, I mean in Australia I think I am worth $200,000 as a young person, if I die prematurely – through my superannuation. There’s also life insurance. I would have accepted those numbers and would support that, especially with the market as it is… everything needs a price in post-modern times.
Also, this is interesting – are these really Harvard students, though??
That simpsons clip was crap. Are these really harvard students? They liked that clip? That show is so awful now — its just numbing stupid schlock. All the writers should be fired.
The simpsons hasnt been good for like 12 seasons. The show is GARBAGE for poor stupid people now
@420squeeg same. great class – very clear and engaging for sure
SUCH a great professor. Im enjoying these so much!!!
@healthyfire I think the whole point of education is to learn how to THINK CRITICALLY and make rational decisions based on that, not follow your gut, I hope that was sarcasm…
some things just dont belong on a scale and to try to put it there is misrepresentation and distortion
Yes mr. sandal what afterall is a community? the question you answered is how to find out how many ppl are in a community i.e. community=56843 he avoided answering the question as to what a community actually is and does….i strongly disagree, just as well i strongly disagree with his statement about pleasure and pains sovereignty
Slavery is totally fine because a bunch of people profit from it.
BTW, $4,500 was a LOT more money around the time of the depression. It would be more equivalent to around $60,000 today, i think. So, keep that in mind. I think I would let someone pull my tooth for $60,000. Although, today, I could get a veneer, so it doesn’t really count.
How in the HELL are there empty seats that were filled in the first lecture. They’d BETTER be sick. What psycho would drop this course. This is the most engaging professor I’ve ever heard. I’m watching his lectures (on the third in a row) for FUN.
Re: living in Kansas, are those numbers in 1930′s dollars? 300 k would have been a lot of money back then.
Re: living in Kansas, are those numbers in 1930′s dollars?
we should just trust our gut and hope for the best.
The higher pleasure of two pleasures is not always the higher pleasure in all possible situations, therefore to rank pleasures based on how you feel about them at a particular moment is incorrect. simple example. I feel pleasure from drinking hot chocolate and eating ice cream, however, I can’t assign the title of higher pleasure to either because they depend on the temperature of the environment in which I reside at a particular moment.
@Tevarion1 If it’s more aesthetically pleasing to save the 1 than the 30 in that case then that is the right path, but if it’s more aesthetically pleasing to save the 30 over the 1 then that is the right path. Moral absolutes are originated by people who decide the value of what is aesthetically superior and people are fools so they follow them. It’s basically the dilemma of thinking for yourself or not, and the latter is very dangerous.
thumbs up if you heard of this guy from colbert repor
There is Intelligent life on YOUTUBE !
WHAT about this….what if the 1 person whos life you were ending to save 30 was einstein? or cure? or george washington…and the 30 people are field hands who never had a descendent that made a major contribution to society?….is it then ok to kill the one to save the 30? is it a matter of pure numbers? 30 >1 or does the value of that life have more weight? and if so how do you quantify that? Or is it that there are no moral absolutes?
One just have to put a cost on human live. Otherwise we would have to make infinitely secured cars with infinite cost. A cheap shield doesn’t make it look necessary, but it you just shift the price of life up..